Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity

Human Affairs: A Postdisciplinary Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 10-22, 2008

17 Pages Posted: 29 Feb 2012

Date Written: January 29, 2007

Abstract

What do we talk about when we talk about ethical diversity as a challenge to the normative justifiability of liberal democracy? Many theorists claim that liberal democracy ought to be reformed or rejected for not being sufficiently 'inclusive' towards diversity; others argue that, on the contrary, liberalism is desirable because it accommodates (some level of) diversity. Moreover, it has been argued that concern for diversity should lead us to favour (say) neutralistic over perfectionist, universalistic over particularistic, participative over representative versions of liberal democracy. This paper provides a conceptual framework to situate those debates, and argues that there are two fundamental ways in which diversity constitutes a challenge to the justificatory status of liberal democracy: consistency (whereby diversity causes clashes between the prescriptions generated by normative political theories), and adequacy (whereby diversity generates a rift between our experience of what is considered valuable and what the theory treats as such).

Keywords: Liberalism, Democracy, Diversity, Pluralism, Citizenship

Suggested Citation

Rossi, Enzo, Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity (January 29, 2007). Human Affairs: A Postdisciplinary Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 10-22, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2013335

Enzo Rossi (Contact Author)

University of Amsterdam ( email )

Department of Political Science
Oudezijds Achterburgwal 237
Amsterdam, 1012 DL
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://uva.academia.edu/EnzoRossi

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
32
Abstract Views
425
PlumX Metrics