Defending Equilibrium Adjustment

7 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2012 Last revised: 19 Jul 2018

See all articles by Orin S. Kerr

Orin S. Kerr

University of California, Berkeley School of Law

Date Written: March 5, 2012

Abstract

This short article for the Harvard Law Review Forum replies to an essay by Professor Christopher Slobogin, An Original Take on Originalism, 125 Harv. L. Rev. F. 14 (2011), which was itself a response to a recent article, Orin S. Kerr, An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 476 (2011). In this reply, Professor Kerr explains why equilibrium-adjustment is not originalism, and shows how originalist and non-originalist approaches to interpreting the Fourth Amendment can coexist using equilbrium adjustment.

Keywords: fourth amendment

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., Defending Equilibrium Adjustment (March 5, 2012). 125 Harvard Law Review Forum 84 (2012), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2016020

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley School of Law ( email )

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
Abstract Views
1,893
rank
181,567
PlumX Metrics