Vagueness, Finiteness, and the Limits of Interpretation and Construction

THE CHALLENGE OF ORIGINALISM: THEORIES OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2011

28 Pages Posted: 6 Mar 2012

See all articles by Grant Huscroft

Grant Huscroft

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law

Date Written: September 5, 2011

Abstract

Vaguely worded/underdeterminate constitutional rights guarantees are a standard problem in constitutional law and have the potential to open a vast role for judicial review. However, there are limits to what courts may accomplish in purporting to interpret or construct rights, limits that originalists and living constitutionalists alike must respect. These limits flow from the idea that bills of rights are finite instruments: they protect only the rights they enumerate, and the vagueness of those rights neither invites nor allows courts to provide rights-based answers to every problem that may arise in constitutional litigation.

Originalists require a means of determining the boundaries of legitimate construction when textual meaning runs out, whereas living constitutionalists must make sense of rights having eschewed the idea that they may have some fixed, fore meaning. The scope of bills of rights is typically limited by design, and the absence of some rights that might have been enumerated may reflect a decision to deny constitutional authority to them, despite the strong moral claim they present. In other words, the silence of a bill of rights may have normative significance.

Drawing on experience under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I argue that Courts must respect the constitutional settlement that a bill of rights reflects, rather than take advantage of vaguely worded guarantees to change the bill of rights, and hence, the nature of the constitutional settlement itself.

Keywords: Originalism, Living Tree, interpretation, construction, judicial review, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, economic and social rights

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K39

Suggested Citation

Huscroft, Grant, Vagueness, Finiteness, and the Limits of Interpretation and Construction (September 5, 2011). THE CHALLENGE OF ORIGINALISM: THEORIES OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, Grant Huscroft, Bradley W. Miller, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2016276

Grant Huscroft (Contact Author)

University of Western Ontario - Faculty of Law ( email )

London, Ontario N6A 3K7 N6A 3K7
Canada
519-661-2111 ext 88375 (Phone)
519-661-3790 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
261
Abstract Views
1,028
rank
132,458
PlumX Metrics