Unpacking What a 'Relationship' Means to Commercial Buyers: How the Relationship Metaphor Creates Tension and Obscures Experience

24 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2012 Last revised: 18 Mar 2012

See all articles by Christopher Phillips Blocker

Christopher Phillips Blocker

Colorado State University

Daniel Flint

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Mark Houston

Texas Christian University

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: February 1, 2012

Abstract

Scholars apply the relationship metaphor as a default conceptual lens to understand commercial interactions. Yet whereas the relationship paradigm sheds light on how the socially embedded structure of these interactions impacts their outcomes, the relationship metaphor can also obscure scholarly understanding of business buyers’ experiences. Results of an interpretive study drawing on depth interviews demonstrate that buyers’ colloquial use of “relationship” language is ubiquitous. However, buyers’ narratives reveal instrumentally saturated emic meanings and felt tensions for the notion of expressive relationships with suppliers, which manifest deep conceptual friction with the constellation of etic relationship properties and constructs used by scholars to explain business interactions. Using Bauman’s sociological commentary on liquid modernity, analyses indicate that framing these interactions as “connections” is a more theoretically congruent lens for viewing buyers’ experiences. Implications for understanding buyers’ desire for relational bonds and recasting ironic “dark side” research findings offer challenges for relationship marketing research.

Suggested Citation

Blocker, Christopher Phillips and Flint, Daniel and Houston, Mark, Unpacking What a 'Relationship' Means to Commercial Buyers: How the Relationship Metaphor Creates Tension and Obscures Experience (February 1, 2012). Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 38, No. 5, p. 886, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2017069

Christopher Phillips Blocker (Contact Author)

Colorado State University ( email )

Fort Collins, CO 80523

Daniel Flint

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Mark Houston

Texas Christian University ( email )

Fort Worth, TX 76129
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
68
Abstract Views
575
rank
310,029
PlumX Metrics