Finding Analogies between Cases: On Robert Alexy’s Third Basic Operation in the Application of Law

ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRECEDENT, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH IVR WORLD CONGRESS, T. Bustamante, C. Bernal, eds. ARSP-Beiheft 133, pp. 59-71, 2012.

13 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2012 Last revised: 6 Jan 2013

See all articles by Thomas Bustamante

Thomas Bustamante

Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)

Date Written: March 7, 2012

Abstract

The point of this essay is to discuss in a critical way one of Robert Alexy’s recent developments to his theory of legal argumentation. While in his earlier writings Alexy distinguished only two basic operations in the application of law, subsumption and balancing, he has recently changed this theory to claim that legal analogy, or comparison of cases, also figures as a third basic operation which shares the same general features of the former two. My purpose, therefore, will be to answer whether Alexy is right when he holds that the comparison of cases can stand besides balancing and subsumption as a basic operation in the application of law.

Keywords: Alexy, basic operations, legal reasoning, balancing, subsumption, analogy

Suggested Citation

Bustamante, Thomas da Rosa, Finding Analogies between Cases: On Robert Alexy’s Third Basic Operation in the Application of Law (March 7, 2012). ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF PRECEDENT, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH IVR WORLD CONGRESS, T. Bustamante, C. Bernal, eds. ARSP-Beiheft 133, pp. 59-71, 2012.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2017469 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017469

Thomas da Rosa Bustamante (Contact Author)

Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) ( email )

Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 31270-901
Brazil

HOME PAGE: http://www.ufmg.br

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
162
Abstract Views
562
rank
184,475
PlumX Metrics