Fixing the Flaws in the Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

69 Pages Posted: 31 Mar 2012

See all articles by Peter H. Meyers

Peter H. Meyers

George Washington University - Law School

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

The Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was a pioneering no-fault federal tort reform innovation when it was created two decades ago, but it is no longer the fast, generous, and less adversarial program that Congress originally created or that the Supreme Court recently described in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. This article describes the serious problems that exist in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program today, and proposes several legislative and other suggestions to fix these problems. Important lessons on how to improve the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program can be learned from several other recent federal compensation programs, including the Smallpox Compensation Program and the 9/11 Compensation Program.

Keywords: tort, tort reform, vaccine, Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, no-fault, compensation program

JEL Classification: H51, I18, K13

Suggested Citation

Meyers, Peter H., Fixing the Flaws in the Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (2011). Administrative Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, p. 785, 2011; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-20; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-20. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2018430

Peter H. Meyers (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202.994.5793 (Phone)
202.994.4946 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/Faculty/profile.aspx?id=1750

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
Abstract Views
837
rank
222,027
PlumX Metrics