Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=202030
 
 

Footnotes (19)



 


 



Owning Genetic Information and Gene Enhancement Techniques: Why Privacy and Property Rights May Undermine Social Control of the Human Genome


Adam D. Moore


University of Washington - The Information School

January 6, 2012

Bioethics, Vol. 14, No. 2

Abstract:     
In this article I argue that the proper subjects of intangible property claims include medical records, genetic profiles, and gene enhancement techniques. Coupled with a right to privacy these intangible property rights allow individuals a zone of control that will, in most cases, justifiably exclude governmental or societal invasions into private domains. I argue that the threshold for overriding privacy rights and intangible property rights is higher, in relation to genetic enhancement techniques and sensitive personal information, than is commonly suggested. Once the bar is raised, so-to-speak, the burden of overriding it is formidable. Thus many policy decisions that have been recently proposed or enacted - citywide audio and video surveillance, law enforcement DNA sweeps, genetic profiling, national bans on genetic testing and enhancement of humans, to name a few - will have to be backed by very strong arguments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 8, 2000 ; Last revised: November 16, 2012

Suggested Citation

Moore, Adam D., Owning Genetic Information and Gene Enhancement Techniques: Why Privacy and Property Rights May Undermine Social Control of the Human Genome (January 6, 2012). Bioethics, Vol. 14, No. 2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=202030

Contact Information

Adam D. Moore (Contact Author)
University of Washington - The Information School ( email )
206.685.9937 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://ischool.uw.edu
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,282
Downloads: 1,173
Download Rank: 12,725
Footnotes:  19