The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
19 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2000
There are 2 versions of this paper
The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
Date Written: Fall 1999
Abstract
Most legal academics and policymakers believe that notions of fairness should be accorded positive weight in evaluating legal policies. We explain, however, that ascribing importance to any notion of fairness (other than one concerned solely with the distribution of income) will sometimes lead to a conflict with the Pareto principle. That is, to endorse a notion of fairness is to endorse the view that it can be desirable to adopt a legal rule that will reduce the well-being of every person in society.
JEL Classification: K00, D63, H43
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Analysis of Welfare Economics, Morality and the Law
-
Any Non-Welfarist Method of Policy Assessment Violates the Pareto Principle: Reply
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Moral Rules and the Moral Sentiments: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Moral Rules and the Moral Sentiments: Toward a Theory of an Optimal Moral System
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Fairness Versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Fairness Versus Welfare: Notes on the Pareto Principle, Preferences, and Distributive Justice
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Principles of Fairness Versus Human Welfare: On the Evaluation of Legal Policy
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
The Conflict between Notions of Fairness and the Pareto Principle
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell
-
Any Non-Individualistic Social Welfare Function Violates the Pareto Principle
By Louis Kaplow and Steven Shavell