Judicial Innovation and Local Politics: Judicialization of Administrative Governance in East China

China Journal, Forthcoming

43 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2012 Last revised: 11 Apr 2012

See all articles by Xin He

Xin He

City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK); University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law, Visiting

Date Written: March 19, 2012

Abstract

Drawing on data from a mid-sized city in eastern China, this article examines the interactions among the courts, the Party, and other administrative agencies. It finds that the courts, caught between the unruly administrative agencies and legal rhetoric, seek support from the Party to enhance their authority. They then devise tactics such as putting the chief official of agencies on the stand, issuing judicial suggestions, and innovatively applying the laws. Many of these tactics prove effective, as agencies adjust their behaviors accordingly. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that the courts are only a passive actor in local politics, the development indicates that the role of the courts is by no means negligible in translating the national laws into local practice. By exploring the dynamics of court-government relations in the context of administrative litigation, this article argues that local politics is a crucial factor in determining the trajectory of China’s judicialization of administrative governance and rule of law more generally.

Suggested Citation

He, Xin, Judicial Innovation and Local Politics: Judicialization of Administrative Governance in East China (March 19, 2012). China Journal, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2026304

Xin He (Contact Author)

City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) ( email )

83 Tat Chee Avenue
Kowloon
Hong Kong

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law, Visiting

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
412
Abstract Views
1,622
rank
77,302
PlumX Metrics