32 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2012 Last revised: 21 Aug 2014
Date Written: June 14, 2012
We examine whether collective intelligence helps achieve a neutral point of view using data from a decade of Wikipedia’s articles on US politics. Our null hypothesis builds on Linus’ Law, often expressed as “Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.” Our findings are consistent with a narrow interpretation of Linus’ Law, namely, a greater number of contributors to an article makes an article more neutral. No evidence supports a broad interpretation of Linus’ Law. Moreover, several empirical facts suggest the law does not shape many articles. The majority of articles receive little attention, and most articles change only mildly from their initial slant.
Keywords: Wikipedia, Linus' Law, Open Source, Neutral Point of View
JEL Classification: L17, L86
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Greenstein, Shane M. and Zhu, Feng, Collective Intelligence and Neutral Point of View: The Case of Wikipedia (June 14, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2027237 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027237