46 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2000
Date Written: 1999
In a recent symposium issue of the George Mason Law Review, Steven Salop and R. Craig Romaine use the Microsoft litigation as a focus for discussion of antitrust law. Salop and Romaine argue that each of the allegations against Microsoft could constitute evidence of a design by Microsoft to reduce competition and to preserve or extend monopoly power. They argue as well that the right legal standard to apply in monopolization cases is a "competitive effects" test that balances the benefits and harms of the monopolist's conduct. This article exposes problems with their approach, explains why it departs from current antitrust standards, and urges an approach consistent with current standards.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cass, Ronald A. and Hylton, Keith N., Preserving Competition: Economic Analysis, Legal Standards and Microsoft (1999). George Mason Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1999. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=202738 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.202738