Should Google Search Be Regulated as a Public Utility?

28 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2012  

Mark A Jamison

University of Florida - Warrington College of Business Administration, Public Utility Research Center

Date Written: March 17, 2012

Abstract

I examine the validity of the arguments for regulating Google search and find that they are insufficient and that regulation would likely be counterproductive. Google search does not fit the traditional frameworks for justifying regulatory control, namely, the public utility concept, common carrier concept, and essential facilities doctrine. For example, Google’s search is not monopolistic in nature, does not preclude rivals from competing against Google, does not rely upon grant of a franchise as does a utility, and does not take control of rivals’ content or service. Furthermore, the advocates for regulation fail to give adequate weight to the changes that constantly occur in the search business, the ways that rivals benefit from Google’s investments, the negative impacts of forcing Google to reveal its search algorithms, and regulation’s stifling effect on innovation.

JEL Classification: K21, K23, L12, L13, L42, L51

Suggested Citation

Jamison, Mark A., Should Google Search Be Regulated as a Public Utility? (March 17, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2027543 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2027543

Mark A. Jamison (Contact Author)

University of Florida - Warrington College of Business Administration, Public Utility Research Center ( email )

PO Box 117142
Gainesville, FL 32611
United States
352-392-6148 (Phone)
352-392-7796 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://warrington.ufl.edu/purc/facultyinfo.asp?WEBID=1217

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
522
rank
48,460
Abstract Views
4,532
PlumX