Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2028781
 
 

Footnotes (191)



 


 



Extended Standing — Enhanced Accountability? Judicial Review of Commonwealth Environmental Decisions


Andrew Edgar


The University of Sydney Law School

March 25, 2012

Federal Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 435-462, 2011
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/16

Abstract:     
Environmental groups have difficulties being granted standing according to common law tests. However, environmental legislation in Australia often includes extended standing provisions that facilitate access to the courts for environmental groups. This article examines judicial review cases involving challenges by environmental groups to Commonwealth environmental decisions. The conclusion that is drawn from the cases is that while environmental groups may have gained access to the courts their challenges often fail on the grounds of judicial review. The cases indicate that the Federal Court has applied the grounds of review in an orthodox, restrained, manner which tends to inhibit the effectiveness of judicial review as an accountability mechanism for environmental groups.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: administrative law, standing, judicial review, environmental groups

JEL Classification: K10, K30, K32


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Edgar, Andrew, Extended Standing — Enhanced Accountability? Judicial Review of Commonwealth Environmental Decisions (March 25, 2012). Federal Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 435-462, 2011; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/16. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2028781

Contact Information

Andrew Edgar (Contact Author)
The University of Sydney Law School ( email )
New Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 801
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 155,223
Footnotes:  191