Sutton v Mishcon De Reya and Gawor & Co: Cohabitation Contracts and Swedish Sex Slaves
12 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2012
Date Written: March 27, 2012
Abstract
In Sutton v Mishcon de Reya and Gawor & Co it was held that a contract between cohabitants, as opposed to a contract for cohabitation, would be valid. The case did not involve a typical cohabitation contract, but for that very reason more closely resembled earlier authorities, particularly eighteenth-century cases. This article reviews the past approach to, current use of, and future potential for, cohabitation contracts.
Keywords: family law, child law, cohabitation contracts, sex slaves
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Probert, Rebecca, Sutton v Mishcon De Reya and Gawor & Co: Cohabitation Contracts and Swedish Sex Slaves (March 27, 2012). Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 453-464, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029851
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.