Sample Selection in the Estimation of Air Bag and Seat Belt Effectiveness
42 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2000 Last revised: 15 Sep 2022
Date Written: July 1999
Abstract
Measurement of seat belt and air bag effectiveness is complicated by the fact that systematic data are collected only for crashes in which a fatality occurs. These data suffer from sample selection since seat belt and air bag usage influences survival rates which in turn determine whether a crash is included in the sample. Past researchers either ignored sample selection or adopted indirect estimation methods subject to other important biases. We propose a simple, but novel, solution to the selection problem: limiting the sample to crashes in which someone in a different vehicle dies. Under relatively weak conditions, consistent estimates can be obtained from this restricted sample. Empirically, we find seat belts to be more effective in saving lives than most previous estimates. Air bags, however, appear to be less effective than generally thought. If our coefficients can be generalized to all crashes, the cost per life saved with seat belts is approximately $30,000, compared to $1.6 million for air bags.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Traffic Fatalities
By Alma Cohen and Liran Einav
-
Estimating the Effect of Alcohol on Driver Risk Using Only Fatal Accident Statistics
By Steven D. Levitt and Jack Porter
-
By Clifford Winston, Vikram Maheshri, ...
-
Shifting Death to Their Alternatives: The Case of Toll Motorways
-
The Effect of Sunday Sales of Alcohol on Highway Crash Fatalities
By Mark Stehr
-
Antiretroviral Therapy Awareness and Risky Sexual Behaviors: Evidence from Mozambique
By Damien De Walque, Harounan Kazianga, ...