To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2012

Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17/2012

24 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2012

See all articles by Jacob H. Rowbottom

Jacob H. Rowbottom

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 2, 2012

Abstract

Expression on the internet is now regulated by a wide range of UK laws, including public order laws, media laws and laws that were drafted to target poison pen letters and nuisance phone calls. While these laws were initially designed to regulate different spheres of activity, they now converge and can regulate the same types of digital expression. Digital speakers are now exposed to various legal controls. Recent cases have shown that conversations on social networks and in other forums can be the subject of criminal prosecution and libel actions. While the European free speech jurisprudence has traditionally focused on protecting speech on matters in the public interest, it is argued that these principles do not give sufficient protection to casual conversations and ‘everyday’ expression. This article considers alternative free speech arguments and looks at the case for more proportionate controls on digital expression.

Keywords: Freedom of speech, digital communications, Article 10, communications act 2003

Suggested Citation

Rowbottom, Jacob H., To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech (April 2, 2012). Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2012 ; Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17/2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2033106

Jacob H. Rowbottom (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,282
Abstract Views
4,993
rank
14,861
PlumX Metrics