Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System
107 American Journal of International Law 45 (2013)
50 Pages Posted: 3 Apr 2012 Last revised: 23 Aug 2013
Date Written: January 1, 2013
Abstract
Attempts to analyze controversial issues in the investment treaty system often result in participants drawing comparisons with and analogies from other legal disciplines, most notably public international law, international commercial arbitration, public law, trade law and human rights law. But how do these comparisons shape our thinking about the investment treaty system, why do different comparisons often support different answers to concrete problems, and which participants tend to support which paradigms and why?
This Article critiques the role that the five most common interpretive paradigms are playing in attempts to understand the nature of the investment treaty system. It provides a schema for analyzing what these approaches reveal and obscure about the system and why they often support conflicting outcomes on controversial issues. It also explores why different actors - including states, investors, NGOs, arbitrators and academics - are likely to argue for, or default to, different paradigms based on their divergent interests and/or backgrounds.
Keywords: investment treaty arbitration, investment treaties, investment treaty system, public international law, international commercial arbitration, public law, trade law, human rights, international public law, paradigms, analogies, deference, countermeasures
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
International Judicial Independence
By Erik Voeten
-
Reversing Field: What Can International Relations Learn from International Law?
By Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack
-
Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation
-
Constructivism and International Law
By Jutta Brunnée and Stephen J. Toope
-
Law, Legalization and Politics: An Agenda for the Next Generation of IR-IL Scholars
By Kenneth W. Abbott and Duncan Snidal
-
International Law and International Relations: Introducing an Interdisciplinary Dialogue
By Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack
-
Courts, Tribunals, and Legal Unification - the Agency Problem
-
Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights
By Shai Dothan
-
Misusing International Sources to Interpret the Constitution