Accentuate the Normative: A Response to Professor McKenna

98 Virginia Law Review In Brief 48 (2012)

St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-0008

13 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2012 Last revised: 2 Oct 2012

See all articles by Jeremy N. Sheff

Jeremy N. Sheff

St. John's University School of Law

Date Written: April 2, 2012

Abstract

This response to Mark McKenna's "A Consumer Decision-Making Theory of Trademark Law" argues that McKenna's project presents a compelling normative account of trademark law that unfortunately suffers from some blurring of "is" and "ought." I attempt to tease apart the descriptive and normative aspects of McKenna's argument. While I disagree with him as to whether search-costs theory is responsible for recent expansions of trademark rights, I think he is correct that search-costs theory is an inadequate normative framework for trademark law. While McKenna's consumer decision-making theory is a good start, I argue that it must confront some fundamental normative questions -- such as the relative importance of welfare maximization and the nature of consumer autonomy -- in order to fulfill its potential as an alternative prescriptive theory of trademark law.

Suggested Citation

Sheff, Jeremy N., Accentuate the Normative: A Response to Professor McKenna (April 2, 2012). 98 Virginia Law Review In Brief 48 (2012), St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-0008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2033369

Jeremy N. Sheff (Contact Author)

St. John's University School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
718-990-5504 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
84
Abstract Views
945
rank
366,702
PlumX Metrics