Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Measuring Group Disadvantage with Inter-Distributional Inequality Indices: A Critical Review and Some Amendments to Existing Indices

34 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2012  

Gaston Yalonetzky

University of Leeds - Leeds University Business School (LUBS); Leeds University Business School (LUBS) - Division of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

A long literature on inter-distributional inequality (IDI) has developed statistical tools for measuring the extent of inequality between two groups (e.g. men versus women). The paper reviews some of the most prominent IDI indices proposed in the last four decades. The assessment focuses on how these indices react to inequalities that are disadvantageous to different groups, using two operationalizations of a concept of group-specific disadvantage focus (GDF). Relying on a complementary set of properties, the review also assesses whether these indices are informative about other interesting features related to IDI comparisons, chiefly distributional equality, but also absence of distributional overlap and presence of firstorder stochastic dominance. The author proposes amendments to several of these indices in order to render them in fulfillment of GDF properties and more informative on the mentioned distributional features.

Keywords: inter-distributional inequality

JEL Classification: D30, J71

Suggested Citation

Yalonetzky, Gaston, Measuring Group Disadvantage with Inter-Distributional Inequality Indices: A Critical Review and Some Amendments to Existing Indices (2012). Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, Vol. 6, 2012-9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2035313 or http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2012-9

Gaston Yalonetzky (Contact Author)

University of Leeds - Leeds University Business School (LUBS) ( email )

Leeds LS2 9JT
United Kingdom

Leeds University Business School (LUBS) - Division of Economics ( email )

Leeds LS2 9JT
United Kingdom

Paper statistics

Downloads
21
Abstract Views
330