Separation Without Mutual Exclusion in Financial Insurance
18 Pages Posted: 10 Apr 2012
Date Written: April 1, 2012
Abstract
In traditional economic models of insurance, sellers typically employ a non-linear pricing scheme to elicit type information from buyers. In financial insurance contracts, such a policy is not possible since contracts are non-exclusive. In addition, counterparty risk in financial contracts can be particularly problematic relative to traditional insurance. Accordingly, we relax the standard assumption of contract exclusivity and allow the insured to contract with many sellers, some of which may be unstable. In contrast to the traditional insurance model, we show that separation of risk types among insured parties can be achieved with linear pricing when there is aggregate counterparty risk. This result is shown to collapse when contracts are cleared through a central counterparty, suggesting that such an arrangement can create opacity.
Keywords: Insurance, Separation, Mutual Exclusion, Counterparty Risk
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Risk-Sharing or Risk-Taking? Counterparty Risk, Incentives and Margins
By Bruno Biais, Florian Heider, ...
-
CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas
By Eric Stephens and James R. Thompson
-
Bank Capital and Dividend Externalities
By Viral V. Acharya, Hanh T. Le, ...
-
Bank Capital and Dividend Externalities
By Viral V. Acharya, Hanh Le, ...
-
Bank Capital and Dividend Externalities
By Viral V. Acharya, Hanh T. Le, ...
-
Clearing, Counterparty Risk and Aggregate Risk
By Bruno Biais, Florian Heider, ...
-
The Failure Resolution of Lehman Brothers
By Michael J. Fleming and Asani Sarkar
-
Funding Liquidity, Market Liquidity and TED Spread: A Two-Regime Model
By Kris Boudt, Ellen C. S. Paulus, ...
-
Optimal Collateralization with Bilateral Default Risk
By Daniel Bauer, Enrico Biffis, ...