Changing Voices in a Familiar Conversation about Rules vs. Standards: Veterans Law at the Federal Circuit in 2011

55 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2012 Last revised: 15 Apr 2012

James D. Ridgway

George Washington University - Law School

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This review of the Federal Circuit's veterans benefits case law in 2011 suggests that a familiar struggle between rules and standards lurks under the surface of some of the more familiar debates in veterans law. In particular, it suggests that the struggle between Chevron deference and Gardner’s rule of resolving ambiguity in favor of the veteran can be framed this way. It also suggests that the rules-versus-standards framing can be used to better understand the debate about what it means for the benefits system to be veteran friendly. In addition, this article addresses the changing dynamics surrounding veterans law and reviews important statistics describing the Federal Circuit’s veterans law decisions in 2011.

Keywords: veterans law, federal circuit, rules, standards, chevron, gardner

Suggested Citation

Ridgway, James D., Changing Voices in a Familiar Conversation about Rules vs. Standards: Veterans Law at the Federal Circuit in 2011 (2012). American University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1175, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038626

James D. Ridgway (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Law School ( email )

2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/Faculty/profile.aspx?id=19582

Paper statistics

Downloads
90
Rank
234,565
Abstract Views
390