Protecting Architectural Forms as Traditional Cultural Expression? Why WIPO Should Go Back to the Drafting Table

36 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2012 Last revised: 3 Jun 2013

Keith A. Goodwin

Columbia University - Law School

Date Written: March 1, 2013

Abstract

In recent decades, developing countries and indigenous communities have increasingly asserted the necessity of protecting so-called “traditional cultural expression” – the array of creative expressions integral to the cultural and social identities of indigenous and local communities – from improper exploitation. Among the more prominent voices responding to such calls has been the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), which has worked to develop an international framework affording traditional cultural expression and folklore sui generis rights. This Note examines WIPO’s recently promulgated Revised Draft Provisions for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions/Expressions of Folklore, which would, among other things, loosely define “architectural forms” as a protectable traditional cultural expression. In evaluating the proposed protection for “architectural forms,” this Note simultaneously assesses the profound tensions WIPO’s Revised Draft Provisions create with respect to the existing U.S. intellectual property regime and identifies the general limits of WIPO’s current vision for protecting traditional cultural expression in general. Ultimately, this Note argues that WIPO’s proposals should not include the vaguely defined category of “architectural forms” as protectable subject matter because the currently broad language would raise serious issues as to public domain and free speech rights, and could seriously impair creative expression, cultural development and the progress of an important professional service.

Keywords: United Nations, WIPO, International Law, Folklore, Traditional Cultural Expression, Intellectual Property, Copyright

Suggested Citation

Goodwin, Keith A., Protecting Architectural Forms as Traditional Cultural Expression? Why WIPO Should Go Back to the Drafting Table (March 1, 2013). Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 51 (2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038669

Keith A. Goodwin (Contact Author)

Columbia University - Law School ( email )

435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Rank
188,059
Abstract Views
1,277