Citations (1)


Footnotes (240)



Exchanging Information Without Intellectual Property

Michael J. Burstein

Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

December 2012

Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, p. 227

Contracting over information is notoriously difficult. Nearly fifty years ago, Kenneth Arrow articulated a “fundamental paradox” that arises when two parties try to exchange information. To complete such a transaction, the buyer of information must be able to place a value on the information. But once the seller discloses the information, the buyer can take it without paying. The conventional solution to this disclosure paradox is intellectual property. If the information is protected by a patent or a copyright then the seller can disclose the information free in the knowledge that the buyer can be enjoined against making, using, or selling it without permission. This account of information exchange forms the basis for an increasingly popular argument in favor of strong and broad intellectual property rights for the purpose of overcoming the disclosure paradox and thereby facilitating the development and commercialization of ideas.

That argument, however, rests on assumptions about the nature of information that are neither theoretically nor empirically justified. This article explains that, contrary to the conventional account of the disclosure paradox, information is not always nonexcludable and is not always a homogeneous asset. Instead, information is complex and multifaceted, subject to some inherent limitations but also manipulable by its holders. These characteristics give rise to a range of strategies for engaging in information exchange, of which intellectual property is only one. Information holders can use the characteristics of information itself as well as contractual and norms-based mechanisms and other legal or business strategies to achieve exchange. And examples drawn from fields as diverse and disparate as software and biotechnology show that entrepreneurs and inventors use these strategies alone or in combination to effectively link their ideas with capital and development skills, often without intellectual property playing a significant role in the transaction.

Intellectual property is therefore not necessary to promote robust markets for information and is, in fact, just as contingent and context-specific a solution to the paradox as the alternatives described here. At the very least, then, there is reason to doubt that commercialization theories founded upon information exchange provide a standalone justification for intellectual property. This article urges caution in policy interventions that seek to respond to the disclosure paradox and sets the stage for future empirical research to better understand the dynamics of information exchange strategies and the social welfare costs and benefits that may accompany them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 56

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 12, 2012 ; Last revised: April 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Michael J., Exchanging Information Without Intellectual Property (December 2012). Texas Law Review, Vol. 91, p. 227. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038772

Contact Information

Michael J. Burstein (Contact Author)
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,410
Downloads: 315
Download Rank: 74,504
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  240