Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children

49 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2012 Last revised: 5 Feb 2013

Date Written: January 2013

Abstract

This article examines whether the hepatitis B vaccination mandate for infants and young children, which exists in 47 states, is constitutional. It reviews relevant judicial and statutory precedents, including constitutional precedents on autonomy, bodily integrity and medical decision making. After considering the history of the hepatitis B mandate, the article concludes that this mandate is questionable under the 14th Amendment due process and equal protection clauses.

Suggested Citation

Holland, Mary S., Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children (January 2013). Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 39, 2012, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2039392

Mary S. Holland (Contact Author)

NYU School of Law ( email )

245 Sullivan St.
Room 349
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
212-998-6212 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
471
Abstract Views
4,282
Rank
128,436
PlumX Metrics