Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2039900
 
 

Footnotes (27)



 


 



Vagueness and Power-Delegation in Law: A Reply to Sorensen


Hrafn Asgeirsson


University of Surrey - School of Law

April 15, 2012

M. Freeman & F. Smith (Eds.), Current Legal Issues: Law and Language (Oxford University Press) 2012

Abstract:     
Roy Sorensen has argued that vagueness in the law cannot be justified by appeal to the value of power-delegation, and thereby threatens to take away one of the main reasons for thinking that vagueness can be valuable to law. Delegation of power to officials is justified, he thinks, only if these officials are in a better position to discover whether a particular x is F, a condition not satisfied in cases of vagueness. I argue that Sorensen’s argument is unsound: delegation of power can be valuable even if the delegates are not in a better position to answer that question.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Philosophy, Law, Language, Vagueness, Legislation, Delegation of Power


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 15, 2012 ; Last revised: November 23, 2012

Suggested Citation

Asgeirsson, Hrafn, Vagueness and Power-Delegation in Law: A Reply to Sorensen (April 15, 2012). M. Freeman & F. Smith (Eds.), Current Legal Issues: Law and Language (Oxford University Press) 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2039900

Contact Information

Hrafn Asgeirsson (Contact Author)
University of Surrey - School of Law ( email )
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 839
Downloads: 141
Download Rank: 159,589
Footnotes:  27