Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned

Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, 2011

157 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2012 Last revised: 4 May 2012

Alina Mungiu-Pippidi

Hertie School of Governance

Date Written: July 1, 2011

Abstract

Fighting corruption has long been a high priority for Norwegian and international development cooperation. This work includes efforts directed at reducing corruption in the delivery of aid, at country level, and at the international policy level.

The present study is one of three recent studies about corruption commissioned by Norad’s evaluation department. Published in 2008, a literature review of how effectively corruption is currently fought revealed that results are sometimes disappointing. The study was commissioned together with the Asian Development Bank, the Department for International Development (UK), Danida (Denmark), Sida (Sweden) and the Swedish Agency for Development Evaluation. A joint external evaluation commissioned by the same agencies and to be published shortly, has looked at support to fighting corruption in developing countries.

Corruption is a subject that can be approached by different disciplines. The sometimes disappointing results of current approaches have stimulated a discussion about our understanding of the basis for fighting corruption and the possible need for new approaches.

Suggested Citation

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned (July 1, 2011). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2042021

Alina Mungiu-Pippidi (Contact Author)

Hertie School of Governance ( email )

Friedrichstrasse 180, Q110
Berlin, 10117
Germany

Paper statistics

Downloads
262
Rank
95,148
Abstract Views
907