The Problem of Implementing a Constitutional System of Capital Punishment
110 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2012
Date Written: April 22, 1995
Abstract
The article examines the history of the Supreme Court’s capital punishment jurisprudence under the Eighth Amendment, focusing on the twin principles that the Court has identified: guided discretion and individualized sentencing. The article argues that these two principles, if both broadly construed, ultimately conflict with each other and result in a death penalty jurisprudence that is internally inconsistent. The article suggests harmonizing the principles by emphasizing the role of guided discretion in capital sentencing while limiting the role of the individualized sentencing principle.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
McAllister, Stephen R., The Problem of Implementing a Constitutional System of Capital Punishment (April 22, 1995). Kansas Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 1039, 1995, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2044037
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.