Sex Offenders and Mental Illness: A Lesson in Federalism and the Separation of Powers

4 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 268, 1998

29 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2012

Date Written: April 22, 1998

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kansas v. Hendricks provides an exclamation point to the proposition that the Court will defer to reasonable legislative judgments regarding the substance of state civil commitment laws. This article argues that such deference is appropriate as a matter of constitutional law because of important institutional and structural considerations. For mental health professionals interested in influencing the law of civil commitment, the Hendricks decision suggests two propositions: (a) Mental health professionals must offer their expertise and input in the legislative process, and (b) when possible, mental health professionals should identify and explain for the courts any professional consensus on important issues regarding the definition and treatment of mental conditions.

Suggested Citation

McAllister, Stephen R., Sex Offenders and Mental Illness: A Lesson in Federalism and the Separation of Powers (April 22, 1998). 4 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 268, 1998, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2044078

Stephen R. McAllister (Contact Author)

University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )

Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
439
PlumX Metrics