Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming
39 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2012
Date Written: April 1, 2012
We examine the relative accuracy of management and analyst forecasts of annual EPS. We predict and find that analysts’ information advantage resides at the macroeconomic level. They provide more accurate earnings forecasts than management when a firm’s fortunes move in concert with macroeconomic factors such as gross domestic product and energy costs. In contrast, we predict and find that management’s information advantage resides at the firm level. Their forecasts are more accurate than analysts’ when management’s actions, which affect reported earnings, are difficult to anticipate by outsiders, such as when the firm’s inventories are abnormally high, the firm has excess capacity, or is experiencing a loss. While analysts are commonly viewed as industry specialists, we fail to find evidence that analysts have an information advantage over managers at the industry level. The two have comparable abilities to forecast earnings for firms with revenues or earnings that are more synchronous with their industries.
Keywords: analyst, management forecast, forecast accuracy
JEL Classification: G14, G30, K22, M41, M45, D82, M40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hutton, Amy P. and Lee, Lian Fen and Shu, Susan, Do Managers Always Know Better? Relative Accuracy of Management and Analyst Forecasts (April 1, 2012). Journal of Accounting Research, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2047107