43 Pages Posted: 5 May 2012 Last revised: 11 May 2012
Date Written: May 4, 2012
Most commentary on redistricting is concerned with fairness to groups, be they racial, political, or geographic. This Essay highlights another facet of the redistricting problem: how the configuration of districts affects the ability of low-information voters to secure responsive, accountable governance. We show that attention to the problem of voter ignorance can illuminate longstanding legal-academic debates about redistricting, and that it brings into view a set of questions that deserve our attention but have received little so far. District designers should be asking how alternative maps are likely to affect local media coverage of representatives, as well as the “branding” strategies of political party elites. Bearing these questions in mind, we offer some tentative suggestions for reform.
Keywords: bipartisan, brands, citizens, congruence, consumers, democracy, Democratic, election law, Fiorina, gerrymandering, government, heterogeneity, homogeneity, informed preference, institutions, interdistrict, knowledge, laws, markets, median, newspapers, politics, Republican, Schottschneider, television
JEL Classification: D72, P16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Elmendorf, Christopher S. and Schleicher, David, Districting for a Low-Information Electorate (May 4, 2012). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 121, No. 7, pp. 1846-1886, May 2012; UC Davis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 294; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-40. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2051093