Legislators V. Regulators: The Case of Low Power FM Radio

46 Pages Posted: 10 May 2012  

Thomas W. Hazlett

Clemson University

Bruno E. Viani

Nathan Associates; CENTRUM-Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 28, 2003

Abstract

The Federal Communications Commission rule making for low-power FM radio was widely reported as an instance where Congress sharply rebuked a regulatory agency for enacting rules too favorable to entrants. Because rival policy optima are quantifiable in this case, the preferences of Congress and the Commission can be directly evaluated. While policy differences between Congress and the regulatory agency were visible to interest groups, they signified a negligible increment when compared to the efficient policy solution. A financial event study supports this interpretation, as radio broadcasters’ equity values were not materially affected by the competitive entry envisioned by the Commission. This suggests that reportedly sharp differences between Congressional and agency political preferences can be trivial in economic terms, as predicted by the Congressional Dominance view of regulation.

Suggested Citation

Hazlett, Thomas W. and Viani, Bruno E., Legislators V. Regulators: The Case of Low Power FM Radio (July 28, 2003). TPRC 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2054068

Thomas W. Hazlett (Contact Author)

Clemson University ( email )

Clemson, SC 29634
United States
8646563430 (Phone)
8646564192 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://hazlett.people.clemson.edu/

Bruno E. Viani

Nathan Associates ( email )

2101 wilson Blvd
ste 1200
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

CENTRUM-Pontifical Catholic University of Peru ( email )

AlomĂ­a Robles 125
Lima, Lima 33
Peru

Paper statistics

Downloads
5
Abstract Views
263