Fiscal Constitutions
CESifo Working Paper Series No. 223
26 Pages Posted: 16 Feb 2000
Date Written: December 1999
Abstract
In this paper we examine how individuals should be treated with respect to taxes, subsidies and agenda setting in constitutions in order to obtain efficient allocations of public goods and to limit tax distortions. We show that if public goods are socially desirable, the simple majority rule as well as taxation constrained to majority winners or a ban on subsidies are second-best constitutions. Equal treatment regarding taxes and subsidies is undesirable. Super majority rules and equal treatment of all citizens with respect to taxes and subsidies, however, is first-best if public goods are socially undesirable. The ex ante expectation of the share and welfare improvements of socially efficient public goods determines which constitution a society will adopt.
Keywords: Incomplete social contracts, constitutions, treatment rules, majority rules
JEL Classification: D70, H41, K12
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Efficient Mechanisms for Public Goods with Use Exclusions
By Peter Norman
-
An Efficiency Rationale for Bundling of Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Monopolistic Provision of Excludable Public Goods Under Private Information
-
Toward an Efficiency Rationale for the Public Provision of Private Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Portfolio Diversification and Value at Risk Under Thick-Tailedness
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods
By Hanming Fang and Peter Norman
-
The Provision and Pricing of Excludable Public Goods: Ramsey-Boiteux Pricing Versus Bundling
-
A Note on Budget Balance Under Interim Participation Constraints: The Case of Independent Types
By Tilman Borgers and Peter Norman