Street-Level Tort Law: The Bureaucratic Justice of Liability Decision-Making

(2012) 75(3) Modern Law Review 347–367

Posted: 11 May 2012

See all articles by Simon Halliday

Simon Halliday

University of York

Colin Scott

University College Dublin (UCD)

Jonathan Ilan

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: May 3, 2012


Most legal scholarship on tort focuses primarily on judicial decisions, but this represents only a limited aspect of tortious liability. The vast majority of decisions concerning tortious liability are made by bureaucrats. Unavoidably then, there are two tiers of justice in tort law. This article focuses on the lower tier – bureaucratic decision-making – arguing that the justice of bureaucratic decisions on tort should be considered on its own terms and not by judicial standards. We develop the notion of bureaucratic justice, applying a normative framework originally set out in relation to public administration. This enables an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of different ways of bureaucratically determining liability claims in tort. The regimes discussed concern the liability of public authorities, but decision makers comprise both state and non-state actors and the bureaucratic justice framework is, in principle, applicable to understand and evaluate the liability of both public and private actors.

Keywords: tort, insurance, bureaucracy

Suggested Citation

Halliday, Simon and Scott, Colin David and Ilan, Jonathan, Street-Level Tort Law: The Bureaucratic Justice of Liability Decision-Making (May 3, 2012). (2012) 75(3) Modern Law Review 347–367, Available at SSRN:

Simon Halliday (Contact Author)

University of York ( email )

York Law School
Freboys Lane
York, YO10 5GD
United Kingdom
+44 1904 325820 (Phone)

Colin David Scott

University College Dublin (UCD) ( email )

Dublin 4

Jonathan Ilan

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics