Critical Conflicts between First-Wave and Feminist Critical Approaches to Alternative Dispute Resolution

38 Pages Posted: 12 May 2012 Last revised: 14 Oct 2015

Danya Shocair Reda

New York University School of Law; Peking University School of Transnational Law

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

This paper examines the contradictory responses of critical legal theory to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms. By tracking the changing character of the responses that response, the paper identifies significant developments over the last twenty-five years in the methodology and conclusions of critical legal scholarship.

The analysis finds that feminist critical approaches to ADR differ markedly from the first-wave (from the mid-1970s until the mid-1980s) critical accounts. They are not only more pragmatic than earlier critical theorists; feminist accounts advocate solutions that are in direct conflict with those of first-wave theorists. Where feminists embrace ADR, first-wave critical theorists express grave concern. Yet this divergence remains largely unacknowledged.

The paper argues that this discontinuity in critical scholarship serves to indicate just how successful and total the attack on formality, championed by first-wave scholars, was. Furthermore, the shift in critical scholarship may be explained by critical feminist scholarship’s adoption of the individual as its unit of analysis, while retaining the critiques of formality it had inherited from first-wave scholarship. The result is a more personalized conception of conflict, rights and remedies.

Keywords: ADR, feminist theory, CLS, critical legal studies

Suggested Citation

Reda, Danya Shocair, Critical Conflicts between First-Wave and Feminist Critical Approaches to Alternative Dispute Resolution (2011). Texas Journal of Women and the Law, Vol. 20, p. 193, 2011; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 12-25 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2056406

Danya Shocair Reda (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Peking University School of Transnational Law ( email )

University Town,
Xili, Nanshan District
Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055
China

Paper statistics

Downloads
90
Rank
234,252
Abstract Views
520