The Affect Deception Model: A Review of Deception in Negotiation and the Role of Emotion in Deception

Posted: 13 May 2012 Last revised: 27 Aug 2015

See all articles by Joseph Gaspar

Joseph Gaspar

Rutgers University - Department of Management and Global Business

Maurice E. Schweitzer

University of Pennsylvania - Operations & Information Management Department

Date Written: September 13, 2012

Abstract

Deception is pervasive in negotiations. Negotiations are characterized by information asymmetries, and negotiators often have both opportunities and incentives to mislead their counterparts. Effective negotiators need to contend with the risk of being deceived, to effectively respond when they identify deception, and to manage the temptation to use deception themselves. In our review of deception research, we integrate emotion research. Emotions are both an antecedent and a consequence of deception, and we introduce the Affect Deception Model (ADM) to represent these relationships. Our model broadens our understanding of deception in negotiations and accounts for the important role of emotions in the deception decision process.

Keywords: deception, lying, emotions, behavioral ethics, negotiations, trust

Suggested Citation

Gaspar, Joseph and Schweitzer, Maurice E., The Affect Deception Model: A Review of Deception in Negotiation and the Role of Emotion in Deception (September 13, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2056885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2056885

Joseph Gaspar (Contact Author)

Rutgers University - Department of Management and Global Business ( email )

1 Washington Park
Newark, NJ 07102
United States

Maurice E. Schweitzer

University of Pennsylvania - Operations & Information Management Department ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States
215-898-4776 (Phone)
215-898-3664 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,567
PlumX Metrics