Shadow Banking, Sovereign Risk and Collective Moral Hazard

25 Pages Posted: 17 May 2012 Last revised: 1 Mar 2013

Date Written: May 15, 2012

Abstract

The paper shows that the time-consistent policy of public bailout affects the private liquidity choice of banks in several ways. First, banks anticipate public support in a liquidity crisis and seek large and socially inefficient exposures to shadow banking, defined as a privately costly technology that allows banks to liquefy their balance sheet. In this way, banks reduce their liquidity need in terms of expensive sovereign debt securities and boost leverage. Second, the liquidity choice becomes risky even with respect to the sovereign debt securities portfolio allocation: banks protected by guarantees from a healthy risk-free government load with cheaper non-domestic risky sovereign debt as they expect to extract public support even in the presence of some sovereign default. Finally, the propensity to expose to shadow banking is procyclical. These insights have important implications in terms of regulation. Global reforms that curb banks' ability to extract free insurance from the public bailout would promote efficiency. Policymakers should resort to a full-blown ban on shadow banking only if the previous goal is unattainable.

Keywords: Liquidity, systemic risk, shadow banking, moral hazard, public bailout

JEL Classification: E44, D8, G18

Suggested Citation

di Iasio, Giovanni and Pierobon, Federico, Shadow Banking, Sovereign Risk and Collective Moral Hazard (May 15, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2060839 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060839

Giovanni Di Iasio (Contact Author)

Bank of Italy ( email )

Via Nazionale 91
00184 Roma
Italy

Federico Pierobon

European Central Bank ( email )

Germany

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,141
rank
187,847
PlumX Metrics