Antitrust Energy

22 Pages Posted: 17 May 2012  

Barak Orbach

University of Arizona

D. Daniel Sokol

University of Florida - Levin College of Law; George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center

Date Written: May 17, 2012

Abstract

Marking the centennial anniversary of Standard Oil Co. v. United States, we argue that much of the critique of antitrust enforcement and the skepticism about its social significance suffer from “Nirvana fallacy”— comparing existing and feasible policies to ideal normative policies, and concluding that the existing and feasible ones are inherently inefficient because of their imperfections. Antitrust law and policy have always been and will always be imperfect. However, they are alive and kicking. The antitrust discipline is vibrant, evolving, and global. This essay introduces a number of important innovations in scholarship related to Standard Oil and its modern applications and identifies shifts in antitrust that will keep the field energized for some time to come.

Keywords: antitrust, standard oil, monopolization, legal history, economic history

JEL Classification: N71, K21, l41

Suggested Citation

Orbach, Barak and Sokol, D. Daniel, Antitrust Energy (May 17, 2012). Southern California Law Review, Vol. 85, 2012; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061790

Barak Orbach

University of Arizona ( email )

1201 E. Speedway Blvd.
Tuscon, AZ 85721-0176
United States
520-626-7256 (Phone)
520.858.0025 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.orbach.org

D. Daniel Sokol (Contact Author)

University of Florida - Levin College of Law ( email )

Spessard L. Holland Law Center
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
(352) 273-0968 (Phone)
(352) 392-3005 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ufl.edu/faculty/d-daniel-sokol

George Washington University Law School Competition Law Center ( email )

200 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
194
Rank
129,260
Abstract Views
1,620