22 Pages Posted: 19 May 2012
Date Written: July 2012
The literature on ideology and decision making offers conflicting expectations about how judges' ideology should affect their votes in cases that raise many legal issues. Using cases from the U.S. courts of appeals, I examine the strength of ideology as a predictor of sincere voting in single and multi‐issue cases, and test whether the same effect for ideology can be seen for liberal and conservative judges. For all judges, ideology yields a larger effect as the number of issues increases; however, conservative judges are much more likely than liberal judges to cast sincere votes at all levels of complexity.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Moyer, Laura P., The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making (July 2012). Law & Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 3, pp. 291-312, 2012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2062032 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2012.00362.x
By Dan Hunter
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $38.00 .
File name: j-9930.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.