When Tigers Bare Teeth: A Qualitative Study of University Patent Enforcement

37 Pages Posted: 24 May 2012 Last revised: 1 Jun 2013

See all articles by Jacob H. Rooksby

Jacob H. Rooksby

Gonzaga University - School of Law

Date Written: March 1, 2013


University participation as plaintiffs in patent infringement litigation is an understudied phenomenon within a postsecondary educational terrain increasingly influenced by academic capitalist approaches to intellectual property protection and dissemination. This article presents findings from an exploratory, qualitative study of senior-level technology transfer professionals at five public universities with recent experience asserting university-owned patents in patent infringement lawsuits. Findings reveal a complex set of considerations that influence university decisions about patent enforcement, including infringer identity, concerns for litigation finance, and the licensing typology of the asserted patent. Additionally, findings suggest a complicated and close relationship between mission and money in university pursuits of patent infringers.

Keywords: patent litigation, universities, technology transfer, academic capitalism, qualitative research

Suggested Citation

Rooksby, Jacob H., When Tigers Bare Teeth: A Qualitative Study of University Patent Enforcement (March 1, 2013). 46 Akron Law Review 169, 2013, Duquesne University School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2065443

Jacob H. Rooksby (Contact Author)

Gonzaga University - School of Law ( email )

721 N. Cincinnati Street
Spokane, WA 99220-3528
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics