EVOLUTION IN INVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION, Chester Brown, Kate Miles, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2011
28 Pages Posted: 24 May 2012
Date Written: October 28, 2010
The academic literature on international investment treaties, foreign investment contracts and investor-state dispute settlement is dominated by legal analysis. This is understandable in light of the complexity and, until recently, relative obscurity of the field. However, it is imperative that scholars from other disciplines now become more actively engaged in the critical debates surrounding investment law and investment arbitration in particular. One example of an issue that has been inadequately addressed and often prematurely dismissed by legal scholars is ‘regulatory chill’. Fundamentally, the notion of regulatory chill suggests that investment arbitration - as an institution - may influence the course of policy development. For reasons that will be laid out in this chapter, investigating regulatory chill requires methods and approaches more familiar to political scientists than to lawyers.
Keywords: investor-state dispute settlement, regulatory chill, investment treaties
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Tienhaara, Kyla, Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science (October 28, 2010). EVOLUTION IN INVESTMENT TREATY LAW AND ARBITRATION, Chester Brown, Kate Miles, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2065706
By Susan Franck