Protectionism IsnT Counter-Cyclic (Anymore)
41 Pages Posted: 25 May 2012
Date Written: April 2012
Abstract
Conventional wisdom holds that protectionism is counter-cyclic; tariffs, quotas and the like grow during recessions. While that may have been a valid description of the data before the Second World War, it is no longer accurate. In the post-war era, protectionism has not actually moved counter-cyclically. Tariffs and non-tariff barriers do not systematically rise during cyclic downturns; if anything, they tend to fall. I document this new stylized fact with a wide panel of data, using a variety of measures of protectionism and business cycles. I also provide some hints as to why protectionism is no longer counter-cyclic.
Keywords: barrier, business cycle, data, empirical, international, panel, policy, recession, tariff, trade
JEL Classification: E32, F13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Trade Effects of Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements
By Peter H. Egger, Mario Larch, ...
-
The Trade Structure Effects of Endogenous Regional Trade Agreements
By Hartmut Egger, David Greenaway, ...
-
Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious?
By Richard Baldwin and Dany Jaimovich
-
Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious?
By Richard Baldwin and Dany Jaimovich
-
Trade Liberalisation with Multinational Firms: Effects on Welfare and Intra-Industry Trade
By Hartmut Egger, David Greenaway, ...
-
Who Benefits from Regional Trade Agreements? The View from the Stock Market
By Christoph Moser and Andrew Kenan Rose
-
Who Benefits from Regional Trade Agreements? the View from the Stock Market
By Christoph Moser and Andrew Kenan Rose
-
Structural Estimation of Gravity Models with Path-Dependent Market Entry