The Twilight of Equity Liquidity

Jeff Schwartz

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

March 3, 2012

34 Cardozo L. Rev., December 2012
University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 15

This Article argues that U.S. equity markets fail to offer a satisfactory listing venue for emerging firms. I contend that this lacuna is a manifestation of a flawed structure of equity-market regulation and that this void undermines entrepreneurship, jeopardizes the future of U.S. equity markets, and weakens the broader U.S. economy. To close this gap and respond to these concerns, I recommend a new theoretical structure for regulating equity markets. Under the “lifecycle model” I propose, regulations would adapt to firms as they age. The key change would be to establish a market specifically for newly-public young firms, where they would be subject to a regulatory regime that is strict enough to protect investors yet flexible enough to accommodate innovation and growth. As firms age, they would be moved to different markets, each set up to meet the unique regulatory challenges firms pose as they mature. This template is designed to offer entrepreneurial firms an attractive platform on which to list their shares while placing equity-market regulation on sound theoretical footing. In a brief Epilogue, I assess the implications of the recently-enacted JOBS Act on this argument and conclude that the case for reform based on the lifecycle model is undiminished.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 79

Keywords: equity, regulation, IPO

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 26, 2012 ; Last revised: April 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Schwartz, Jeff, The Twilight of Equity Liquidity (March 3, 2012). 34 Cardozo L. Rev., December 2012; University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2066934

Contact Information

Jeff Schwartz (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 748
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 222,548
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper