26 Pages Posted: 26 May 2012
We investigated experimentally whether people can be induced to believe in a non-existent expert, and subsequently pay for what can only be described as transparently useless advice about future chance events. Consistent with the theoretical predictions made by Rabin (2002) and Rabin and Vayanos (2010), we show empirically that the answer is yes and that the size of the error made systematically by people is large.
Keywords: gambler's fallacy, hot-hand, random streak, expertise, information
JEL Classification: C91, D03
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Powdthavee, Nattavudh and Riyanto, Yohanes E., Why Do People Pay for Useless Advice? Implications of Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies in False-Expert Setting. IZA Discussion Paper No. 6557. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2066980