An (Un) Common Frame of Reference: An American Perspective on the Jurisprudence of the CESL

19 Pages Posted: 27 May 2012 Last revised: 2 Aug 2012

See all articles by Lisa Bernstein

Lisa Bernstein

University of Chicago - Law School; University of Oxford - Centre for Corporate Reputation

Date Written: May 26, 2012

Abstract

This essay examines the ability of the recently proposed Common European Sales Law to meet its goal of increasing cross-border trade across the Common Market, in light of its deeply realist jurisprudence and its extensive reliance on the concepts of trade usage and good commercial practice. It concludes that a more formalistic statute that provided menus of clear contract default rules and encouraged a jurisprudential approach similar to that adopted by New York Courts, would have a better chance than the CESL of increasing cross-border trade, especially among small and medium size enterprises.

Keywords: European Sales Law, Commerical Law, Usage of Trade

Suggested Citation

Bernstein, Lisa E., An (Un) Common Frame of Reference: An American Perspective on the Jurisprudence of the CESL (May 26, 2012). Common Market Law Review, Forthcoming, University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 606, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2067196

Lisa E. Bernstein (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

University of Oxford - Centre for Corporate Reputation

Park End Street
Oxford OX1 1HP
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
246
Abstract Views
1,181
rank
136,257
PlumX Metrics