Tracking Ability of ETFs: Physical vs. Synthetic Replication

18 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2012

See all articles by Athanasios Fassas

Athanasios Fassas

University of Thessaly; Hellenic Open University

Date Written: May 28, 2012

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the tracking ability of physical (in-kind) and synthetic (swap-based) Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). By using three different measures of tracking error, I examine ten pairs of ETFs, which on aggregate track different asset classes (equities, bonds, commodities and foreign exchange rates), are sponsored by several investment companies and are listed on various stock exchanges. For consistency purposes though, each pair under review tracks the same underlying index/ asset, trades on the same stock exchange and is denominated in the same currency. The empirical results indicate that on average physically-replicated ETFs are over-performing their corresponding swap-based ETFs in terms of tracking ability. The findings indicate that there is a statistically significant difference in the tracking error of ETFs that employ physical replication and ETFs that employ synthetic replication. Hence, investors should consider the replication technique when they make their investment decisions concerning ETFs.

Keywords: Exchange Traded Funds, tracking ability, physical and synthetic replication, swap-based ETFs

JEL Classification: G19, G23

Suggested Citation

Fassas, Athanasios, Tracking Ability of ETFs: Physical vs. Synthetic Replication (May 28, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2069022 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2069022

Athanasios Fassas (Contact Author)

University of Thessaly ( email )

Argonafton & Filellinon
38221 Volos, 41110
United States

Hellenic Open University ( email )

Parodos Aristotelous 18
Patra, 26335
Greece

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
196
Abstract Views
667
Rank
317,770
PlumX Metrics