Palestine and the Politics of International Criminal Justice

William A. Schabas, Yvonne McDermott & Niamh Hayes (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013)

14 Pages Posted: 1 Jun 2012 Last revised: 1 Jun 2013

See all articles by John Reynolds

John Reynolds

National University of Ireland, Maynooth

Michael G. Kearney

University of Sussex; University of Sussex Law School

Abstract

The indeterminacy of international law rarely works in favour of the peoples of the global South. Ambiguities and uncertainties are invariably resolved by resort to broader legal principles, policy goals or social contexts that have most often been shaped by colonial views of the world and their supporting conceptual apparatuses. The glimmer of hope presented in the wake of Third World decolonisation by an international law that seemed to offer the prospect of a realignment of the global balance of power and the possibility of a new international economic order has long been extinguished. Despite this, nations that were on the wrong side of imperial history remain unwilling to depart the arena of international law, retaining a belief in its transformative potential and in the ideal of law as a means of constraining, if not subverting, the hegemony of empire. The promise of the International Criminal Court in this regard lies in its global potential. By virtue of its mere existence, the Court alters the dynamics of international relations and sounds a warning signal that no Colonel, Comrade or Commander-in-Chief remains impervious. At the same time, however, the reality is that all international legal institutions are intensely political actors. The International Criminal Court is no different. It can be understood as a site of meta-conflict, where conflict over the nature of a given conflict plays out, and inevitably some particular narrative is endorsed and consolidated at the expense of others. What that narrative will be often depends less on the law than on the socio-political context. The premise that international criminal justice can fully transcend international politics is a false one – it is inherently political. The International Criminal Court in both its constitution (its relationship with the Security Council, for example) and its functioning (the Prosecutor’s exercise of discretion, for example) essentially serves to implement a form of foreign policy. The Office of the Prosecutor’s decision of April 2012 – to eschew a functional approach to Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute and decline jurisdiction over alleged international crimes committed in Palestine – is read in this light. The effect, despite widespread recognition of Palestine and its admission as a member state of UNESCO, is a continuing exclusion of the Palestinians from the mechanisms of international justice.

Keywords: Palestine, Israel, international criminal law, international criminal court, international law, Gaza, UN security council, UNESCO

JEL Classification: K14, K33, N45

Suggested Citation

Reynolds, John and Kearney, Michael G., Palestine and the Politics of International Criminal Justice. William A. Schabas, Yvonne McDermott & Niamh Hayes (eds.), The Ashgate Research Companion to International Criminal Law: Critical Perspectives (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2071138

John Reynolds (Contact Author)

National University of Ireland, Maynooth ( email )

Maynooth, County Kildare
Ireland

Michael G. Kearney

University of Sussex ( email )

School of legal studies
Brighton, Sussex BNI 9RH
United Kingdom

University of Sussex Law School ( email )

Falmer
Brighton BN1 9QN
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
537
Abstract Views
1,734
rank
51,886
PlumX Metrics