The Romantic Collective Author

Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Vol. 14 (2012)

Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12-28

22 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2012 Last revised: 10 Sep 2012

See all articles by Margaret Chon

Margaret Chon

Seattle University School of Law

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

Although the romantic collective author is a much more elusive creature than its romantic individual counterpart, it can be discerned amidst the proliferation of expression on the Internet. This article first outlines the ways in which the romantic author effect operates through both its genius and its arbiter prongs within collaborative authorship practices in digital networks. It next turns to scientific collaboration, where this author effect is attenuated, to assess whether scientific authorship practices might contribute to a more realistic and less romantic understanding of expressive authorship practices. A subsequent case study of collaborative digital authorship by Wikipedia contributors uncovers some of the underlying social processes giving rise to Wikipedia’s position of collective genius and authority. Analysis of these collaborative authorship processes reveals implicit certification functions, which can obscure various biases that should be addressed in order to shape a more inclusive and reliable knowledge environment.

Keywords: author, collective work, compilation, copyright, digital networks, Internet, joint work, romantic author, scientific authorship, social media, UGC, Web 2.0, Wikipedia

Suggested Citation

Chon, Margaret, The Romantic Collective Author (2012). Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Vol. 14 (2012) ; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12-28. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2076959

Margaret Chon (Contact Author)

Seattle University School of Law ( email )

901 12th Avenue, Sullivan Hall
P.O. Box 222000
Seattle, WA n/a 98122-1090
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
104
rank
252,670
Abstract Views
884
PlumX Metrics