Faithful Presence and Theological Jurisprudence: A Response to James Davison Hunter

8 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2012

Date Written: June 8, 2012


This paper considers how James Hunter’s arguments, presented both in his address and his book To Change the World, might inform the development of a constructive religious legal theory based in the particular resources of Christian theology. In speaking of religious legal theory, I mean something quite different than a theory of law and religion. For some time, the academic conversation about law and religion has centered around issues concerning church-state relations and, more broadly, the place of religion within the liberal political order. Yet, the regnant methodological concerns that have shaped this discourse reflect the boundedness of law to a modern secular imaginary. This being the case, pulling theology into deeper conversation with legal thought will require freeing law from its lingering state of captivity. Hunter’s work is particularly useful in this ground-clearing task because it offers a dense critique of the sociological assumptions that have shaped legal modernity. While his concern is not with religious legal theory as such, Hunter’s normative account of Christian being in the world, captured most fully in the idea of faithful presence, contains important resources for developing a model of Christian engagement with law.

Keywords: post-secular, pluralism, Christianity, theological jurisprudence, To Change the World, faithful presence, religious legal theory

Suggested Citation

Calo, Zachary, Faithful Presence and Theological Jurisprudence: A Response to James Davison Hunter (June 8, 2012). Pepperdine Law Review, Vol. 39, p. 1001, 2012, Available at SSRN:

Zachary Calo (Contact Author)

Hamad bin Khalifa University ( email )

Education City
Doha, 00000
‭+974 4454 1938‬ (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics