39 Pages Posted: 14 Jun 2012 Last revised: 21 Jun 2012
Date Written: June 12, 2012
The asset allocation of university endowments has recently shifted dramatically towards alternative investments. In this paper we examine the role played by strategic competition in motivating this shift. Using a metric capturing competition for undergraduate applications, we test whether endowment performance relative to a school’s nearest competitor is associated with the likelihood of changing investment policy, and conditionally, whether the nature of that change is consistent with the goal of “catching up” to its closest rival. Conditional on indicating a policy change, we find that endowments appear to use marketable alternatives – i.e. hedge funds – to catch up to competitors. More generally, we find evidence that endowments with below median holdings of alternative investments tend to shift policies in that direction. Besides herding behavior we also find trend-chasing behavior. Endowments with recent positive experience with various alternative asset classes tend to increase exposure to them. We consider the long-run implications of this competitive and trending behavior for the ability of endowments to deliver intergenerational equity.
JEL Classification: G2, D4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Goetzmann, William N. and Oster, Sharon M., Competition Among University Endowments (June 12, 2012). Yale SOM Working Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2083720 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2083720