Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Deciding Not to Decide: Deferral in Constitutional Design

International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 9, Nos. 3/4, 2011

U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 389

41 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 2012  

Rosalind Dixon

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law

Tom Ginsburg

University of Chicago Law School

Date Written: 2011

Abstract

In designing constitutions, constitutional drafters often face constraints that cause them to leave things “undecided” — or to defer decision-making on certain constitutional issues to the future. They do this both through adopting vague constitutional language, and through specific language that explicitly delegates issues to future legislators (i.e. “by law” clauses). The aim of this article is to deepen our understanding of this second, to date largely un-examined, tool of constitutional design. We do so by exploring: (1) the rationale for constitutional deferral generally; (2) the potential alternatives to “by law” clauses as a means of addressing concerns about constitutional “error” and “decision” costs: (3) the disadvantages, as well as advantages, to such clauses: (4) the likely and actual prevalence of such mechanisms in national constitutions; and (5) the optimal use of such clauses. The paper draws on both the empirical dataset created by the Comparative Constitutions Project and case material from Australia, Brazil, Iraq, Kenya, South Africa, Taiwan, and the U.S. involving instances of arguably “successful” and “unsuccessful” constitutional deferral.

Suggested Citation

Dixon, Rosalind and Ginsburg, Tom, Deciding Not to Decide: Deferral in Constitutional Design (2011). International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 9, Nos. 3/4, 2011; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 389. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2085011

Rosalind Dixon

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law ( email )

Kensington, New South Wales 2052
Australia

Tom Ginsburg (Contact Author)

University of Chicago Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
288
Rank
88,414
Abstract Views
1,111